Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 76
Filter
1.
Chinese Journal of Hematology ; (12): 479-483, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-984647

ABSTRACT

Objective: To study the incidence of bloodstream infections, pathogen distribution, and antibiotic resistance profile in patients with hematological malignancies. Methods: From January 2018 to December 2021, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics, pathogen distribution, and antibiotic resistance profiles of patients with malignant hematological diseases and bloodstream infections in the Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University. Results: A total of 582 incidences of bloodstream infections occurred in 22,717 inpatients. From 2018 to 2021, the incidence rates of bloodstream infections were 2.79%, 2.99%, 2.79%, and 2.02%, respectively. Five hundred ninety-nine types of bacteria were recovered from blood cultures, with 487 (81.3%) gram-negative bacteria, such as Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eighty-one (13.5%) were gram-positive bacteria, primarily Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Enterococcus faecium, whereas the remaining 31 (5.2%) were fungi. Enterobacteriaceae resistance to carbapenems, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam, and tigecycline were 11.0%, 15.3%, 15.4%, and 3.3%, with a descending trend year on year. Non-fermenters tolerated piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam, and quinolones at 29.6%, 13.3%, and 21.7%, respectively. However, only two gram-positive bacteria isolates were shown to be resistant to glycopeptide antibiotics. Conclusions: Bloodstream pathogens in hematological malignancies were broadly dispersed, most of which were gram-negative bacteria. Antibiotic resistance rates vary greatly between species. Our research serves as a valuable resource for the selection of empirical antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Humans , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Cefoperazone , Sulbactam , Retrospective Studies , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Hematologic Neoplasms , Sepsis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Gram-Positive Bacteria , Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination , Escherichia coli
2.
Brasília; s.n; 19 jun. 2020. 24 p.
Non-conventional in Portuguese | BRISA, LILACS, PIE | ID: biblio-1100432

ABSTRACT

O Informe Diário de Evidências é uma produção do Ministério da Saúde que tem como objetivo acompanhar diariamente as publicações científicas sobre tratamento farmacológico e vacinas para a COVID-19. Dessa forma, são realizadas buscas estruturadas em bases de dados biomédicas, referente ao dia anterior desse informe. Não são incluídos estudos pré-clínicos (in vitro, in vivo, in silico). A frequência dos estudos é demonstrada de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, coortes, entre outros). Para cada estudo é apresentado um resumo com avaliação da qualidade metodológica. Essa avaliação tem por finalidade identificar o grau de certeza/confiança ou o risco de viés de cada estudo. Para tal, são utilizadas ferramentas já validadas e consagradas na literatura científica, na área de saúde baseada em evidências. Cabe ressaltar que o documento tem caráter informativo e não representa uma recomendação oficial do Ministério da Saúde sobre a temática. Foram encontrados 9 artigos e 6 protocolos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Immunoglobulins/therapeutic use , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Heparin/therapeutic use , Cefoperazone/therapeutic use , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Oseltamivir/therapeutic use , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Moxifloxacin/therapeutic use , Thymalfasin/therapeutic use , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use
3.
Brasília; s.n; 13 maio 2020. 22 p.
Non-conventional in Portuguese | LILACS, BRISA, PIE | ID: biblio-1097393

ABSTRACT

Essa é uma produção do Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia (Decit) da Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação e Insumos Estratégicos em Saúde (SCTIE) do Ministério da Saúde (Decit/SCTIE/MS), que tem como missão promover a ciência e tecnologia e o uso de evidências científicas para a tomada de decisão do SUS, tendo como principal atribuição o incentivo ao desenvolvimento de pesquisas em saúde no Brasil, de modo a direcionar os investimentos realizados em pesquisa pelo Governo Federal às necessidades de saúde pública. Informar sobre as principais evidências científicas descritas na literatura internacional sobre tratamento farmacológico para a COVID-19. Além de resumir cada estudo identificado, o informe apresenta também uma avaliação da qualidade metodológica e a quantidade de artigos publicados, de acordo com a sua classificação metodológica (revisões sistemáticas, ensaios clínicos randomizados, entre outros). Foram encontrados 15 artigos e 10 protocolos.


Subject(s)
Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Renin-Angiotensin System , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Steroids/therapeutic use , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sulbactam/therapeutic use , Cefoperazone/therapeutic use , Chloroquine/therapeutic use , Plasmapheresis/instrumentation , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Lopinavir/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Antimalarials/therapeutic use
4.
Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. (Online) ; 54(3): e17565, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-974411

ABSTRACT

The aim of this work is to evaluate simple, sensitive, effective and validated procedures for the determination of cefotaxime, cefoperazone, ceftazidime and cefadroxil. In this study, the methods based on the ability of the cited drugs to reduce Ag+ ions to silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) in the presence of Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone (PVP) as a stabilizing agent producing very intense surface plasmon resonance peak of Ag-NPs (λmax. = 410-430 nm). The plasmon absorbance of the Ag-NPs allows the quantitative spectrophotometric determination of the cited drugs. The calibration curves are linear with concentration ranges of 0.4-3.2, 1-8, 0.5-4.0 and 1.5-9.0 µg/mL for cefotaxime, cefoperazone, ceftazidime and cefadroxil, respectively. Apparent molar absorptivity, detection and quantitative limits are calculated. Applications of the proposed methods to representative pharmaceutical formulations are successfully presented. The extracellular synthesis of nanoparticles is fast, and the method doesn't require various elaborate treatments and tedious extraction procedures.


Subject(s)
Cefadroxil/analysis , Cefoperazone/analysis , Cefotaxime/analysis , Ceftazidime/analysis , Metal Nanoparticles/statistics & numerical data , Surface Plasmon Resonance/methods , Validation Study
5.
Chinese Medical Journal ; (24): 659-664, 2017.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-266930

ABSTRACT

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as an important pathogen causing a variety of infections. Using data from the China Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance Program conducted biennially, we investigated the secular changes in the resistance of 2917 isolates of A. baumannii from 2004 to 2014 to differ antimicrobial agents.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Pathogen samples were collected from 17 to 20 hospitals located in the eastern, central, and western regions of China. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by a 2-fold agar dilution method, and antimicrobial susceptibility was established using the 2014 Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute-approved breakpoints. Isolates not susceptible to all the tested aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, β-lactams, β-lactam/β-lactam inhibitors and carbapenems were defined as extensively drug resistant.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The rates of nonsusceptibility to common antimicrobial agents remained high (>65%) over the years with some fluctuations to certain agents. The prevalence of imipenem-resistant A. baumannii (IRAB) increased from 13.3% in 2004 to 70.5% in 2014 and that of extensively drug-resistant A. baumannii (XDRAB) increased from 11.1% in 2004 to 60.4% in 2014. The activity of tigecycline was stable with MIC90 ≤4 mg/L against A. baumannii from 2009 to 2014. Susceptibility to colistin remained high (97.0%) from 2009 to 2014. The prevalence of XDRAB increased in all the three surveillance regions over the years and was significantly higher in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) wards than non-ICU wards.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>This longitudinal multicenter surveillance program revealed the nationwide emergence of A. baumannii in China and showed a significant increase in prevalence from 2004 to 2014. High levels of bacterial resistance were detected among samples collected from clinical settings in China, with IRAB and XDRAB being especially prevalent. This study will help to guide empirical therapy and identify at-risk groups requiring more intense interventional infection control measures, while also helping to focus surveillance efforts.</p>


Subject(s)
Humans , Acinetobacter baumannii , Amikacin , Pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents , Pharmacology , Cefoperazone , Pharmacology , Ceftazidime , Pharmacology , Cephalosporins , Pharmacology , China , Colistin , Pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Imipenem , Pharmacology , Levofloxacin , Pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Minocycline , Pharmacology , Penicillanic Acid , Pharmacology , Piperacillin , Pharmacology , Sulbactam , Pharmacology
6.
An. bras. dermatol ; 91(6): 808-810, Nov.-Dec. 2016. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-837983

ABSTRACT

Abstract Acute localized exanthematous pustulosis is a localized variant of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, which is characterized by the eruption of multiple scattered pustules following drug administration. A 72-year-old woman presented with multiple erythematous pustules on her face, which had appeared two days after using cefoperazone and sodium sulbactam. Histopathological findings showed subcorneal pustules and mixed inflammatory cell infiltration in the dermis. The pustules resolved within about two weeks after the patient discontinued the antibiotics. This report discusses the case of a woman with a cutaneous drug reaction consistent with acute localized exanthematous pustulosis that occurred after cefoperazone and sodium sulbactam were administered.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Sulbactam/adverse effects , Cefoperazone/adverse effects , Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis/etiology , Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis/pathology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Skin/pathology , Time Factors , Biopsy
7.
Chinese Medical Journal ; (24): 1711-1718, 2016.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-251317

ABSTRACT

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Inflammation is supposed to play a key role in the pathophysiological processes of intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IIRI), and Candida albicans in human gut commonly elevates inflammatory cytokines in intestinal mucosa. This study aimed to explore the effect of C. albicans on IIRI.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Fifty female Wistar rats were divided into five groups according to the status of C. albicans infection and IIRI operation: group blank and sham; group blank and IIRI; group cefoperazone plus IIRI; group C. albicans plus cefoperazone and IIRI (CCI); and group C. albicans plus cefoperazone and sham. The levels of inflammatory factors tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-μ, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and diamine oxidase (DAO) measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to evaluate the inflammation reactivity as well as the integrity of small intestine. Histological scores were used to assess the mucosal damage, and the C. albicans blood translocation was detected to judge the permeability of intestinal mucosal barrier.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The levels of inflammatory factors TNF-μ, IL-6, and IL-1β in serum and intestine were higher in rats undergone both C. albicans infection and IIRI operation compared with rats in other groups. The levels of DAO (serum: 44.13 ± 4.30 pg/ml, intestine: 346.21 ± 37.03 pg/g) and Chiu scores (3.41 ± 1.09) which reflected intestinal mucosal disruption were highest in group CCI after the operation. The number of C. albicans translocated into blood was most in group CCI ([33.80 ± 6.60] ×102 colony forming unit (CFU)/ml).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Intestinal C. albicans infection worsened the IIRI-induced disruption of intestinal mucosal barrier and facilitated the subsequent C. albicans translocation and dissemination.</p>


Subject(s)
Animals , Female , Rats , Amine Oxidase (Copper-Containing) , Metabolism , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Pharmacology , Candida albicans , Virulence , Cefoperazone , Pharmacology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Interleukin-1beta , Metabolism , Interleukin-6 , Metabolism , Intestines , Allergy and Immunology , Metabolism , Rats, Wistar , Reperfusion Injury , Allergy and Immunology , Metabolism , Microbiology
8.
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae ; (6): 185-188, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-329850

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To analyze the clinical features of pandrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (PDR-Ab) in the Chinese PLA General Hospital and compare the efficacies of different antibiotic treatments in aged patients with ventilator-associative pneumonia (VAP) caused by PDR-Ab.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Data were collected from all isolated PDR-Ab strains in our hospital from April 2009 to April 2010. The clinical features, treatment, and outcomes were retrospectively reviewed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>PDR-Ab was found to be the dominant pathogen in 42 of 126 aged VAP patients. Cefoperazone/sulbactam plus minocycline showed good efficacy in 20 patients with PDR-Ab VAP, showing a clinical cure rate of 65% (13/20) and a bacterial eradication rate of 40% (8/20). Another 22 patients were treated with other antimicrobial drugs, achieving a clinical cure rate of 22.7% (5/22) and a bacterial eradication rate of 13.6% (3/22). The factors influencing bacterial clearance were prolonged length of hospital stay and mechanical ventilation prior to positive culture (all P<0.01).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Cefoperazone/sulbactam plus minocycline can be an effective treatment for VAP caused by PDR-Ab.</p>


Subject(s)
Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Acinetobacter baumannii , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Therapeutic Uses , Cefoperazone , Therapeutic Uses , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Drug Therapy, Combination , Minocycline , Therapeutic Uses , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Drug Therapy , Microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Sulbactam , Therapeutic Uses , Treatment Outcome
9.
Chinese Journal of Surgery ; (12): 775-780, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-336683

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To study the concentrations and pharmacokinetics of 6 different kinds of antibiotics in rabbit bile, and evaluate their microbicidal potential.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Thirty-six health rabbits were randomly divided into 6 groups, and each group was 6 rabbits. After anaesthesia, the common bile duct of rabbit was isolated and cumulated with a silicone tube. The rabbits were administered intravenously with the equal-effect dose of antibiotics. Bile (1.5 ml) was collected at different time points after administration, and the concentration of antibiotics of bile was assayed by high performance liquid chromatography. The bile drug concentration-time data were processed by software to figure out the pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximum concentration (C(max)), peak time (T(max)), half-life time (T(1/2)), clearance (CL) and apparent volume of distribution (VD). The bile antibiotics concentration contrasted to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and attained the bactericidal index (C(max)/MIC) and the time when the drug concentration exceeded the MIC (T(>MIC)).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The C(max) and T1/2 of each antibiotic were as the followings: piperacillin (7 950 ± 3 023) mg/L and (1.97 ± 1.23) h, ceftriaxone (1 104 ± 248) mg/L and (3.14 ± 0.57) h, cefoperazone (5 215 ± 2 225) mg/L and (0.89 ± 0.13) h, meropenem (31.97 ± 12.44) mg/L and (0.36 ± 0.11) h, levofloxacin (66.3 ± 36.9) mg/L and (3.32 ± 2.57) h, metronidazole (28.2 ± 10.2) mg/L and (0.81 ± 0.33) h, respectively. Piperacillin/tazobactam and cefoperazone/sulbactam had the largest bactericidal index and the longest T(>MIC), and their bactericidal indexes were (62.1 ± 23.6) - (993.8 ± 377.9) and (164.8 ± 69.0) - (659.3 ± 275.9), their T(>MIC) were (6.00 ± 2.53) - (8.00 ± 0.00) h and (6.33 ± 1.97) - (8.00 ± 0.00) h. The bactericidal index and T(>MIC) of levofloxacin were the smallest, which were (2.1 ± 1.2) - (8.3 ± 4.6) and (0.54 ± 0.25) - (2.67 ± 1.03) h . Ceftriaxone and meropenem were as the medium, and their bactericidal indexes and T(>MIC) were (4.3 ± 1.0) - (69.2 ± 15.5) , (1.42 ± 0.65) - (8.00 ± 0.00) h and (2.0 ± 0.8) - (1 031.3 ± 401.4) , (0.29 ± 0.10) - (1.83 ± 0.26) h. The bactericidal index of metronidazole to anaerobic ranged from 7.4 to 294.9, and the T(>MIC) ranged from 1.88 to 5.00 h.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The bile concentrations of six antibiotics all exceed their effective bactericidal concentrations. The concentration-time curves of piperacillin, cefoperazone, meropenem and metronidazole conformed to one-compartment model, and ceftriaxone and levofloxacin are conformed to two-compartment model. Piperacillin/tazobactam and cefoperazone/sulbactam have the largest bactericidal index and the longest T(>MIC), so they can be chosen as the first choice for the therapy of hepatobiliary infection.For the anaerobic, the microbicidal potential of metronidazole is high.</p>


Subject(s)
Animals , Rabbits , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Pharmacokinetics , Bile , Chemistry , Cefoperazone , Pharmacokinetics , Drug Combinations , Metronidazole , Pharmacokinetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Penicillanic Acid , Pharmacokinetics , Piperacillin , Pharmacokinetics , Random Allocation , Sulbactam , Pharmacokinetics , Thienamycins , Pharmacokinetics
11.
Medical Forum Monthly. 2011; 22 (6): 20-23
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-124604

ABSTRACT

To collect data of pathogens responsible for surgical site infection in elective abdominal surgeries and the drugs effective against them. Department of Surgery, District Head-quarters Teaching Hospital, Dera Ismail Khan from 1[st] January 2005 to 31[st] December 2009. Retrospective study on all cases of surgical site infections in elective abdominal surgeries over five years. Pus and swabs from infected wounds were sent to find the pathogens responsible for these infections and the drugs highly sensitive against them. 175 cases of abdominal surgeries with surgical site infection were collected over duration of five years. Their culture sensitivity reports showed positive result in 160 cases and negative result in 15 cases. Organism most commonly responsible for abdominal wound infection in our study was Klebsiella pneumonae. It was found in 53 patients [33.12%] followed by pseudomonas aeriginosa in 43 patients [26.8%] and E coli in 40 patients [25%]. Other micro-organisms were Staph-aureus [6.8%], Enterobactor [3.75%], Streptococcus [3.12%] and Clostridia [1.25%]. Sensitivity report of these microbes showed that Sulzone [cefoperazone plus sulbactum] is the most effective antibiotic.i.e. In 90 patients [56.25%], followed by Amikacin in 40 patients [25%] and Ciprofloxacin in 15 patients [9.3%]. Other drugs showing higher sensitivity against these pathogens were Fosfomycin in 10 cases [6.25%] and Imipenum in 5 cases [3.125%]. The study gives us clues to the type of pathogens that we would expect in our surgical site infection wounds of abdominal surgery, and the antibiotics which can be empirically used against these infections


Subject(s)
Humans , Abdomen/surgery , Hospitals, Teaching , Retrospective Studies , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Escherichia coli , Staphylococcus aureus , Enterobacter , Streptococcus , Clostridium , Sensitivity and Specificity , Cefoperazone , Sulbactam , Amikacin , Ciprofloxacin , Fosfomycin , Imipenem
12.
Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research ; : 114-122, 2010.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-134544

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Skin allergies through type 1 and 4 hypersensitivity reactions are the most frequent manifestations of drug allergies. We had previously experienced a case of a nurse with cefotiam-induced contact urticaria syndrome. To aid in preventing the progression of drug-induced allergic disease in nurses, we conducted a survey of tertiary hospital nurses who were likely to have been exposed professionally to antibiotics. METHODS: All 539 staff nurses at a tertiary hospital were asked to respond to a questionnaire regarding antibiotic exposure. Of the 457 nurses (84.8%) who responded, 427 (79.2%) received a physical examination of the hands and 318 (59.0%) received skin prick tests with the beta-lactam antibiotics cefotiam, cefoperazone, ceftizoxime, flomoxef, piperacillin and penicillin G. RESULTS: A positive response to at least one of the antibiotics occurred in 8 (2.6%) of the 311 subjects included in the analysis and stages 1 and 2 contact urticaria syndrome were observed in 38 (8.9%) and 3 (0.7%) of 427 nurses, respectively. The frequencies of a positive antibiotic skin test (6.9 versus 1.3%, chi-square=7.15, P=0.018), stage 1 contact urticaria syndrome (14.4 versus 7.4%, chi-square=4.33, P=0.038) and drug allergy (15.3 versus 3.6%, chi-square=18.28, P=0.000) were higher in subjects with a positive skin allergy history than in those without. Allergic rhinitis (P=0.02, OR=3.86, CI=1.23-12.06), night cough (P=0.04, OR=3.12, CI=1.03-9.41) and food allergy (P=0.00, OR=9.90, CI=3.38-29.98) were significant risk factors for drug allergy. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic sensitization and drug allergy occurred more frequently in nurses with a positive skin allergy history. Atopy may be an important risk factor for drug allergy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cefoperazone , Cefotiam , Ceftizoxime , Cephalosporins , Cough , Drug Hypersensitivity , Food Hypersensitivity , Hand , Hypersensitivity , Penicillin G , Physical Examination , Piperacillin , Rhinitis , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial , Risk Factors , Skin , Skin Tests , Tertiary Care Centers , Urticaria , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research ; : 114-122, 2010.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-134541

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Skin allergies through type 1 and 4 hypersensitivity reactions are the most frequent manifestations of drug allergies. We had previously experienced a case of a nurse with cefotiam-induced contact urticaria syndrome. To aid in preventing the progression of drug-induced allergic disease in nurses, we conducted a survey of tertiary hospital nurses who were likely to have been exposed professionally to antibiotics. METHODS: All 539 staff nurses at a tertiary hospital were asked to respond to a questionnaire regarding antibiotic exposure. Of the 457 nurses (84.8%) who responded, 427 (79.2%) received a physical examination of the hands and 318 (59.0%) received skin prick tests with the beta-lactam antibiotics cefotiam, cefoperazone, ceftizoxime, flomoxef, piperacillin and penicillin G. RESULTS: A positive response to at least one of the antibiotics occurred in 8 (2.6%) of the 311 subjects included in the analysis and stages 1 and 2 contact urticaria syndrome were observed in 38 (8.9%) and 3 (0.7%) of 427 nurses, respectively. The frequencies of a positive antibiotic skin test (6.9 versus 1.3%, chi-square=7.15, P=0.018), stage 1 contact urticaria syndrome (14.4 versus 7.4%, chi-square=4.33, P=0.038) and drug allergy (15.3 versus 3.6%, chi-square=18.28, P=0.000) were higher in subjects with a positive skin allergy history than in those without. Allergic rhinitis (P=0.02, OR=3.86, CI=1.23-12.06), night cough (P=0.04, OR=3.12, CI=1.03-9.41) and food allergy (P=0.00, OR=9.90, CI=3.38-29.98) were significant risk factors for drug allergy. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic sensitization and drug allergy occurred more frequently in nurses with a positive skin allergy history. Atopy may be an important risk factor for drug allergy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cefoperazone , Cefotiam , Ceftizoxime , Cephalosporins , Cough , Drug Hypersensitivity , Food Hypersensitivity , Hand , Hypersensitivity , Penicillin G , Physical Examination , Piperacillin , Rhinitis , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial , Risk Factors , Skin , Skin Tests , Tertiary Care Centers , Urticaria , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Indian J Cancer ; 2009 Oct-Dec; 46(4): 318-322
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-144268

ABSTRACT

Background: Infection is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. In most of these cases empirical treatment is provided because the focus of infection is not identified. Empiric antibiotics provided to these patients are based on isolates, sensitivity, and on guidelines. Here we have compared three antibiotics recommended as empirical treatment by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA). Aims: To compare the three antibiotic sensitivities for gram negative isolates at our institute. Objective: To choose the optimal antibiotic as the empirical treatment for cancer patients developing infections. Materials and Methods: We collected the data on isolates and antibiotic sensitivity patterns of isolates for ceftazidime, piperacillin + tazobactum, and cefoperazone from the medical oncology department. We subsequently compared the sensitivity of these three antibiotics. Statistical Methods: The isolates were mapped using the WHONET 5.4 software. The analysis was conducted using SPSS 15.0 for Windows. McNemar Chi-square test was used to compare the sensitivity percentages between any two antibiotics. The agreement between the antibiotic and the gold standard was calculated using the Kappa statistic. Two tailed p values were reported. Results: The results showed that there was a difference among sensitivities for these antibiotics. It appears that the sensitivity of ceftazidime was inferior to the two other antibiotics. Also cefoperazone has better sensitivity as compared to piperacillin + tazobactum. Conclusion: In spite of these three antibiotics being recommended by IDSA our data suggest that it should not be followed blindly and local sensitivity data is important for formulating institutional guidelines for using antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/etiology , Cefoperazone/pharmacology , Ceftazidime/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Empirical Research , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Penicillanic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Penicillanic Acid/pharmacology , Piperacillin/pharmacology , Retrospective Studies , Sulbactam/pharmacology
15.
Journal of Forensic Medicine ; (6): 437-439, 2009.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-983521

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#To establish a new high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for determining the concentration of cefazolin, cefradine, cefoperazone and cefotaxime in blood and urine, as well as to investigate its applicability.@*METHODS@#Protein in blood and urine was precipitated directly by acetonitrile with acetanilide was used as the internal standard using Agilent Zorbax SB-Aq column (250 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 microm). The mixed solvents of water (triethylamine 0.12%, acetic acid 0.12%) and acetonitrile were used as the mobile phase to separate cephalosporins using gradient elution method at 1 mL/min (flow rate) and 254 nm (detection wavelength).@*RESULTS@#The working curve of four cephalosporins showed a good correlation (r = 0.9993), with the detection limit up to 0.01 microg/mL. The recovery rate was more than 81.2%.@*CONCLUSION@#This method is fast, easy and accurate. It is suitable for biological analysis of the 4 cephalosporins of the blood and urine in practical cases.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Male , Anti-Bacterial Agents/urine , Cefazolin/urine , Cefoperazone/urine , Cefotaxime/urine , Cephalosporins/urine , Cephradine/urine , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Forensic Toxicology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Specimen Handling
16.
JPMI-Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute. 2009; 23 (4): 304-308
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-134369

ABSTRACT

To identify common organisms causing burn infection and their antimicrobial sensitivity pattern. A retrospective study of sixty patients with burn wound infection was carried out at burn unit of Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar from September 2006 to August 2007. Children who received burn injuries with signs and symptoms of septicemia were included in this study. Age, sex, percentage of burn wound and etiology of burn wounds was recorded. Culture and sensitivity tests were performed from burn wounds of those patients who were having fever and other features of septicemia by tissue culture of all patients[from infective sites] and their results were noted. Out of sixty patients, fourty were male and twenty were female pediatric burn patients. The most frequent organism isolated was staphylococcus aureus [25%], followed by pseudomonas [21.6%]. Other organisms included mix pseudomonas and staphylococcus aureus [23.5%], E-coli [13%], proteus [3%], Klebsiella [3%]. All these organisms were resistant to most routine antibiotics. This study highlights that staphylococcus aureus [25%] and pseudomonas [21.6%] are the most common organisms and cefoperazone/sulbactam and imipenem/cilastatin are the most effective empirical therapy in our setup


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pediatrics , Wound Infection , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcus aureus , Pseudomonas , Cefoperazone , Sulbactam , Imipenem , Cilastatin
17.
Korean Journal of Medicine ; : S238-S242, 2009.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-221455

ABSTRACT

Anaphylaxis caused by beta-lactam antibiotics usually develops following the systemic administration of the drug, although it can also occur with trivial contact of the drug on the skin in extraordinarily sensitive individuals. Cefotiam is a second-generation cephalosporin developed in Japan, and cefotiam-induced contact urticaria and systemic symptoms (contact urticaria syndrome) have been reported in several nurses from Japan and Korea. Considering the serious nature of the systemic manifestations, such as hypotension, contact anaphylaxis is a more appropriate name for severe forms of the disease than contact urticaria syndrome. No previous study has reported a case involving contact urticaria syndrome to multiple drugs. We describe a case of cefotiam-induced contact anaphylactic shock combined with cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced contact urticaria syndrome in a 24-year-old nurse. She exhibited positive skin prick test responses to both cefotiam and cefoperazone/sulbactam.


Subject(s)
Humans , Young Adult , Anaphylaxis , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cefoperazone , Cefotiam , Hypotension , Japan , Korea , Skin , Sulbactam , Urticaria
18.
The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine ; : 578-584, 2009.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-106756

ABSTRACT

Simultaneous drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) caused by multiple drugs is rare. We report a case of a patient who developed DIIHA caused by 2 drugs. The patient's serum exhibited agglutination of ceftizoxime- or sulbactam-coated red blood cells (RBCs; via a drug-adsorption mechanism) and of uncoated RBCs in the presence of sulbactam (via an immune-complex mechanism). Although ceftizoxime is known to exhibit a positive reaction by an immune-complex method with or without reactivity with drug-coated RBCs, this patient's antibodies were reactive only against drug-coated RBCs. On the other hand, sulbactam, which is known to cause hemolytic anemia by nonimmunologic protein adsorption, exhibited positive reactions in tests with both drug-coated RBCs and in the presence of sulbactam. This is the first report of DIIHA due to a sulbactam-cefoperazone combination and the fourth report of DIIHA due to ceftizoxime. Owing to the patient's complicated laboratory results, DIIHA was suspected only at a late stage. We propose that for the prompt diagnosis of DIIHA, tests for all possible causative drugs should be conducted by 2 methods.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Anemia, Hemolytic/chemically induced , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Cefoperazone/adverse effects , Ceftizoxime/adverse effects , Erythrocytes/chemistry , Sulbactam/adverse effects
19.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-38343

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To perform a bioequivalence study of the two 1.5 g cefoperazone (1.0 g) and sulbactam (0.5 g) between Cefper and Sulperazon injections. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The present study was performed in 24 Thai healthy male volunteers who were intramuscularly injected a single dose of 1.5 g cefoperazone and sulbactam. A single dose, two periods, two sequences, double blind randomized crossover with a one-week washout period was used. Blood samples were collected before and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours after intramuscular injection and determined for cefoperazone and sulbactam plasma concentration by validated HPLC-UV methods. The pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by noncompartmental analysis and the ANOVA was carried out. RESULTS: Tax of both cefoperazone and sulbactam for volunteers who were injected with either Cefper or Sulperazon injection were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The 90% confidence intervals of the log of ratio of either C(max) or AUC(last) or AUC(inf) of both cefoperazone and sulbactam between 1.5 g Cefper and Sulperazon injections were within the bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25. CONCLUSION: The 1.5 g cefoperazone and sulbactam injection of Cefper and Sulperazone used in the present study are bioequivalent.


Subject(s)
Adult , Analysis of Variance , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Area Under Curve , Cefoperazone/administration & dosage , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Confidence Intervals , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Sulbactam/administration & dosage , Thailand , Therapeutic Equivalency
20.
JAMC-Journal of Ayub Medical College-Abbotabad-Pakistan. 2008; 20 (1): 113-117
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-87388

ABSTRACT

The vaginal flora is a complicated environment, containing dozens of microbiological species in variable quantities and relative proportions. The frequent cause of vaginal discharge is an infection or colonization with different microorganisms. Some pathologic conditions causing vaginitis are well defined yet, 7-72% of women with vaginitis may remain undiagnosed and such forms of abnormal vaginal flora neither considered as normal, nor can be called bacterial vaginosis have been termed as 'intermediate flora' and its management probably differ from that of bacterial vaginosis. It is of crucial importance in pregnant females at risk of preterm delivery. The present study has been conducted especially to elucidate this type of aerobic vaginal isolates and their culture and sensitivity towards currently used antibiotics. This study was conducted at the Microbiology Department of Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi over a period of two years [April 2004-March 2006]. One thousand, nine hundred and twenty three high vaginal swabs, both from indoor and outdoor patients were collected, cultured and their susceptibility to various antibiotics was determined. Significant growth was obtained in 731 samples. The highest frequency of infection [39.5%] was observed at 31-40 years followed by 41-50 years [35.8%]. About 76% were from outdoor and 24% were from indoor patients. Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent vaginal pathogen at 11-60 yrs and with highest prevalence at 31-40 years followed by 41-50 years. It was a predominant pathogen in both indoor [35%] as well as outdoor [41.6%] patients, followed by enteric gram-negative bacilli and other gram-positive cocci. There were very few antibiotics among the conventionally available aminoglycosides, third generation cephalosporins, penicillin, quinolones, sulfonamides and tetracyclines possessing good sensitivity [>80%] against any one the common aerobic vaginal pathogens. The effective chemotherapeutics agents belong to the groups of carbapenems and beta-lactams beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations. The high prevalence of gynaecological infections demands that the patients with gynaecological symptoms be investigated thoroughly. Culture must invariably be done. Currently the antibiotics showing good sensitivity are very expensive. So there is a need for an effective antimicrobial policy. Effective drug should be reserved for the treatment of serious life threatening situations only


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Bacteria, Aerobic , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Staphylococcus aureus , Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria , Escherichia coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae , beta-Lactamases , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , beta-Lactams , Cefoperazone , Piperacillin , Carbapenems , Sulbactam , Penicillanic Acid/analogs & derivatives
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL